Even the word in English, SPRING, brings to mind a hop~ and a skip~
and a jump~---an upward trajectory.
Enjoy the uplift with a spring in your step.
Life is reaffirming itself.
Blessing
Even the word in English, SPRING, brings to mind a hop~ and a skip~
and a jump~---an upward trajectory.
Enjoy the uplift with a spring in your step.
Life is reaffirming itself.
Blessing
History
is written by the victors. So said Winston Churchill. Napoleon called it a
fable agreed upon.
In
my current WIP, a pre-teen learns that what she knows of history, even recent
history, is but a version of it and not the most interesting version.
Young
people learn from books and increasingly from games and other visual media, (such
as movies) what passes for the “true” story of humanity’s past.
Even
scientific truths are augmented by storytelling. Think of the visualization in
school textbooks of what the dinosaurs looked like. These are hypothetical
guesses, periodically revised. Yet these images are taken as true depictions of
a world now gone.
The
greatest achievement of winning in battle may not be the spoils of war or avoiding
the pain of being ravaged. It may be that you and yours get to be the ones
telling the story of who did what to whom.
Somehow,
perhaps because I began my life in an embattled region, I felt the need to
tackle this thorny matter. Even more, it
seems all the more important to make younger readers consider it.
Storytellers
have an outsized responsibility, one few can begin to achieve, to have their
audience made aware of what a vantage point does to perception.
Because
perception is reality is more than a cliché. It is what we carry forward
and use to make decisions. “Knowing history as to not repeat it” misses the
point. Whose history do we know? Because, Virginia, it seems to me we are repetitiously
repeating the repeats.
Having
just completed the fourth draft of my work in progress (=WIP) and with two beta
readers’ feedback to help navigate the last two drafts, I can now assess what
an anomaly this current WIP has been.
I
was never a true planner. I have a writing friend, a published novelist, who
not only fully charts all the details, plot points and characters of her stories
before she begins typing the first paragraph, but if she finds that her writing
has so much as begun to stray off the planned course, she deletes those pages
and gets back on the road she had marked.
I
can’t imagine writing this way. Too much like the homework back in school days:
I know I must do it, I have a feeling of satisfaction when it’s done, but the
work itself is torture, if you find extreme tedium torturous.
I
know two writers who are complete pansters, (=writing by the seat of their pants) no plan whatsoever. They sit down to a writing session with no idea what will
appear on the screen/page. Stephen King claims to be one. He sits to write in
order to find out what will happen next. This is successful only for those who
have so ingrained story structure in their creative mind that it turns out
brilliantly, or at least not a complete going-nowhere-mess.
Panstering
is very much like a flying trapeze without a safety net.
I
had attempted this once a few years back and gave up after the first chapter.
I then sat down to make a rough chart and proceeded as I usually do. I follow the
chart loosely, discovering some surprises along the way but basically staying
the charted course. Some call this “discovery writing.” It’s a plan that is not
detailed, and the details are spontaneous and immensely enjoyable parts of
the process.
I
started my current WIP this way. But this time, right after the first chapter,
the story went its own way. I had so completely lost control of this galloping
horse that I didn’t stop to glance at my charted plan. What was happening on
the page bore little resemblance to my plan.
It
was as if I attached the reigns of a trusted old workhorse to a carriage. Once
we left the carriage house, the horse began to gallop. To my horror, I
discovered it was not the horse I thought I had attached, but a wild stallion. I
was driving a carriage that a young wild horse I'd never met before had taken over. I had no control.
I’d
start every writing session dreading where it was going. I had no idea where it
would end.
Well,
it did end. A second draft surprised me, because it sort of held together.
What’s
next? Who knows. But it’s been an experience.
A
writing colleague who had beta-read for me (and I for her) and who, like me,
had been on occasion paid to freelance edit, let me know one of the books she
had edited had won an important award.
When
she mentioned the title, I gasped. It’s one I had read because it came recommended
and it is an exquisite literary novel for middle grades. Aside from the
mentioned award, this novel had garnered accolades from all the sources that
matter in publishing.
The
glory, rightly, goes to the author. The financial gain goes to the publisher.
But what goes to the editor who guided it to the mature version the world got
to read?
No
glory, or even a smidgen of recognition, will attach to this all-important arm
of the publishing journey. Some writers will mention their editor’s name in the
acknowledgement page. But the public at large only knows editors when the
latter write their memoires, and this they get to publish only if they had
edited well known writers, plural.
Try
not to chuckle as I confess this reminded me of intelligence officers as part
of national security. Few know what battles they fought so we won’t have to.
Editors are like the CIA field agents whom the public will never know.
Unsung
heroes are a special breed. They work for the job at hand and not for a
pat on the back.
To
the editors: