There is a ubiquitous how-to
writing suggestion to cut any of the text which isn’t serving the plot. This
includes description of landscape, weather, and general sideshows.
Writers of yore had no such compunctions,
and leisurely took us to places where we stopped and smelled the roses before
resuming the characters’ journeys to their resolutions. Poor Tolstoy would have
been eviscerated by contemporary editors for the almost novella-length chapters
that veered off the plot. I know, I read War and Peace, the whole thing.
Today, we are told we don’t have
the time. Readers don’t have the patience. No one can stand still and wait for
the narration when it takes the slightest rest.
I had an editor tell me that a
half-page section of dialogue, while hilarious, didn’t advance the action. When
I suggested it served both as more character revelation and also for comic relief,
the editor’s response was that readers, especially young ones, don’t have the
time for that. Cut, cut, CUT.
And, for that matter, also cut the
view of the countryside as seen by the main character from the moving train
window. Never mind that the train is moving fast. The plot is what must move here,
so unless there’s a killer on the train who’s looking for our hero, we don’t
need to see or hear our hero’s thoughts on the train. Move, move, MOVE.
I humbly suggest we should strike
a middle ground here. Resting places in novels are precious spaces, and I
intend to keep them, because as a reader I need them just as much as the
fictional characters do.
6 comments:
I agree with you. Readers can always skip descriptions if they don't want to read them. And as for humorous dialogues, they're the reason I'm more likely to go back and re-read a favorite book later.
Amen! Some of my favorite books have digressions that have enlightened me so much. I like being with characters who are thoughtful.
I don't agree that readers, including young readers, want everything to move so fast that all description or moments of humor are lost. Anne Tyler has been a best-selling novelist for many years. I treasure the exposition in her work.
Love,
Janie
Love,
Janie
What to say? The world has speeded up so much that descriptive passages are to be cut? This is not hilarious, but sad.
Although I'm the type of writer who has to usually add more description rather than cut it, I totally agree that readers need resting places. It also provides contrast from the more active bits. And humor is a must, especially if the plot is intense. I had to smile when you mentioned Tolstoy. I love War and Peace, but I'm sure the wolf hunt section or his digressions about the meaning of history would've never been printed if he published today.
I love humorous dialogue, even if it doesn't advance the plot. I'm not fond of landscape description, especially lots of it. But I've seen it well done by good writers. One example is Jonathan Kellerman. He usually manages to incorporate mood, theme, or character development (a character's use of interior decoration) into his descriptions.
I gave up on War and Peace, partly because of the rambling, partly because of the multiple names for one character. The only way I could get through Moby Dick (which I had to read in university) was by skipping the whaling chapters.
Post a Comment