Last week I posted about the sad writerly R. (Rejection L)
This post is about the happy one, the Revise & Resubmit Request, known as
R&R. J
R&R requests can come from agents, editors, or even
critique-partners. For the purpose of this post I will refer to them as
Publishing Professionals, or PP for short. Their suggestions can be detailed
and clear, (which means specific) or
brief and general. They culminate with an invitation to re-submit the revised
manuscript.
R&R are happy ‘R’s, because they are another chance to
improve. They may turn into a contract, but mostly they are a chance to make
the work better, and maybe take a leap in the craft for years to come. A good
thing.
I take these seriously, always, no exceptions. I also admit
they cause trepidation. Can I manage a revision successfully? Do I understand
what the issues are? Is there even a point to try to tackle this thorny thing?
Calm down, now. Take a deeeeep breath. Sleep on it. And
then...
...And then I tackle the clearest most manageable suggestions
first. I check the issues off as I go, though I will re-examine my checked-off
points at the end, again.
One at a time, step by step. The fog clears, and the road is visible.
One at a time, step by step. The fog clears, and the road is visible.
What if two R&R from two PP come at once, and they
are contradictory? I don’t mean somewhat, or generally pointing to different
things that need changing. I mean specifically.
Example: PP #1 says the main character’s name is spot-on,
and part of why they were immediately drawn to the story and the allusion of the name to a notable cultural phenomenon is brilliant. PP #2 says the main
character’s name must be changed, because the allusion to that same specific
cultural phenomenon is undesirable.
I give this example, because it has happened to me.
I give this example, because it has happened to me.
You could choose to make the change and return the
manuscript to the one who suggested it. You could choose not to. You could
re-submit two different versions to two different PP. You could go and stand on
your head for a while until enough blood rushes in and you see more clearly.
My point is these occurrences are reminders that as happy as R&R are, they are not created equally and there is more than one-way to milk a cow.
My point is these occurrences are reminders that as happy as R&R are, they are not created equally and there is more than one-way to milk a cow.
But please don’t take this as advice about milking, for
which I only know one way. For storytelling, there are many ways and then there’s
your way. So that’s my final piece of cheese for today: remember the story is
yours. Take advice from PP who respect this and treat you as the good writer
you are.
Reader is so subjective. Editors will disagree just as much as readers will. It's similar to how an author can intend for a story to have one meaning, while the reader might get something completely different from it.
ReplyDeleteSo true. Once it leaves your desk, a story is reborn many times.
DeleteYou have a good perspective on all this, Mirka. Keep writing. And keep revising when it's the right thing to do.
ReplyDeleteYes, Ma'am. Considering that many of the suggestions have come from a thoughtful reader such as yourself, you bet! I'm so deeply in your debt I doubt I can ever repay it.
DeleteGetting a revise & resubmit request is a big plus for any writer, getting 2 from 2 different publishers says here's a ms that's going to find a home.
ReplyDeleteFrom your typing hands to the powers that be...
DeleteI think you just have to trust your gut instinct about whether a revision will improve a story or make it worse.
ReplyDeleteWhen several people were puzzled by a plot twist that I thought I had foreshadowed adequately, I knew that I had to insert one more foreshadowing scene--without being too obvious and spoiling the surprise.
These AH-HA moments when you know what to do are the best.
DeleteTo make a sale, if I have an R&R, I usually make the change. But I keep all of my versions of the story, so sometimes, my agent can send different versions to different editors if needed. I don't think I've encountered conflicting information yet... Good post, Mirka.
ReplyDeleteI have found that when I am uncertain about a revision, I do it anyway and keep the other version(s) as well. The happiest are the suggestions that strike me as so spot-on I never want to go back to an earlier version. Good that you have an agent who is comfortable submitting different versions to different editors.
DeleteI prefer the spot-on suggestions, too. Otherwise it's really just one opinion over another. But, like several of you, I'd probably do it while keeping older versions in mind.
ReplyDeleteI've undertaken a few significant rewrites, after two or three readers pointed out the same "flaw." I go with my gut as much as I can.
ReplyDelete